PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-212.24%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with FSLR at -7.72%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
23.02%
Some D&A expansion while FSLR is negative at -1.10%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
234.21%
Some yoy growth while FSLR is negative at -58.92%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
7.24%
Less SBC growth vs. FSLR's 28.58%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-3243.32%
Negative yoy working capital usage while FSLR is 24.20%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-63.45%
AR is negative yoy while FSLR is 3.45%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
58.57%
Inventory growth well above FSLR's 4.42%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-248.28%
Negative yoy AP while FSLR is 123.14%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-396.81%
Both reduce yoy usage, with FSLR at -28.45%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-1274.77%
Negative yoy while FSLR is 902.71%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-459.13%
Negative yoy CFO while FSLR is 144.07%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-29.72%
Both yoy lines negative, with FSLR at -26.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while FSLR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
100.00%
Purchases well above FSLR's 127.35%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines are negative, with FSLR at -102.46%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
62.93%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. FSLR's 5979.20%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
81.13%
Investing outflow well above FSLR's 114.72%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.46%
Buyback growth of 32.46% while FSLR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.