PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
708.13%
Some net income increase while FSLR is negative at -11.83%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-2.72%
Negative yoy D&A while FSLR is 22.73%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-143.44%
Negative yoy deferred tax while FSLR stands at 123.85%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
4.10%
SBC growth while FSLR is negative at -254.36%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
150.95%
Slight usage while FSLR is negative at -60.74%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-181.74%
AR is negative yoy while FSLR is 279.40%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-153.50%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with FSLR at -722.17%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
80.99%
A yoy AP increase while FSLR is negative at -115.59%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
137.65%
Some yoy usage while FSLR is negative at -140.42%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
112.79%
Well above FSLR's 199.49%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
946.34%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x FSLR's 41.01%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-235.47%
Both yoy lines negative, with FSLR at -53.85%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2383.17%
Negative yoy purchasing while FSLR stands at 54.58%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-149.58%
Both yoy lines negative, with FSLR at -301.21%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-229.08%
We reduce yoy invests while FSLR stands at 56.22%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
400.53%
We repay more while FSLR is negative at -2982.34%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-104.63%
We cut yoy buybacks while FSLR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.