1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-101.42%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with FSLR at -25.63%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-11.34%
Negative yoy D&A while FSLR is 11.81%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
22.99%
Some yoy growth while FSLR is negative at -177.84%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-19.29%
Negative yoy SBC while FSLR is 163.14%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-640.12%
Both reduce yoy usage, with FSLR at -417.11%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
140.74%
AR growth while FSLR is negative at -137.29%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-438.18%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with FSLR at -143.25%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-116.69%
Negative yoy AP while FSLR is 154.76%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-298.32%
Both reduce yoy usage, with FSLR at -334.89%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-25.87%
Both negative yoy, with FSLR at -95.44%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-171.46%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with FSLR at -112.52%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-208.05%
Negative yoy CapEx while FSLR is 20.20%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-55.29%
Both yoy lines negative, with FSLR at -173.80%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
63.05%
Some yoy expansion while FSLR is negative at -261.50%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
122.34%
We have some liquidation growth while FSLR is negative at -29.80%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
127.59%
Growth well above FSLR's 100.01%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
50.34%
We have mild expansions while FSLR is negative at -66.91%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with FSLR at -747.53%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-602.35%
We cut yoy buybacks while FSLR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.