PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-6871.81%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with FSLR at -47.28%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
6.33%
Less D&A growth vs. FSLR's 16.05%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
104.01%
Some yoy growth while FSLR is negative at -137.09%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-2.63%
Negative yoy SBC while FSLR is 22.31%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
77.62%
Slight usage while FSLR is negative at -36.46%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-194.05%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with FSLR at -310.20%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
136.89%
Some inventory rise while FSLR is negative at -67.73%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
8.02%
Lower AP growth vs. FSLR's 285.47%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
56.17%
Growth well above FSLR's 68.92%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
1530.18%
Some yoy increase while FSLR is negative at -387.37%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
39.38%
Some CFO growth while FSLR is negative at -363.38%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
47.70%
Some CapEx rise while FSLR is negative at -30.76%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
101.45%
Acquisition spending well above FSLR's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
-50.00%
Negative yoy purchasing while FSLR stands at 85.18%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
25166.86%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x FSLR's 57.70%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
126.93%
We have some outflow growth while FSLR is negative at -144662.50%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
137.35%
Investing outflow well above FSLR's 82.70%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
83.67%
Buyback growth of 83.67% while FSLR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.