PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-150.75%
Negative net income growth while FSLR stands at 221.43%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
6.21%
D&A growth well above FSLR's 11.11%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
1306.90%
Some yoy growth while FSLR is negative at -48.01%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-7.55%
Both cut yoy SBC, with FSLR at -8.26%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
92.99%
Well above FSLR's 99.71% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-5.15%
AR is negative yoy while FSLR is 3.36%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-129.49%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with FSLR at -32.67%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
204.80%
A yoy AP increase while FSLR is negative at -97.26%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
213.44%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. FSLR's 988.69%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
699.03%
Some yoy increase while FSLR is negative at -194.56%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
120.36%
Operating cash flow growth at 50-75% of FSLR's 199.81%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging operational liquidity vs. competitor.
25.82%
Some CapEx rise while FSLR is negative at -1.32%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
8190.69%
Acquisition growth of 8190.69% while FSLR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-29.87%
Negative yoy purchasing while FSLR stands at 81.33%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines are negative, with FSLR at -79.55%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-102.55%
We reduce yoy other investing while FSLR is 54.68%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-228.81%
Both yoy lines negative, with FSLR at -324.02%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
312.87%
We repay more while FSLR is negative at -48198.42%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.51%
Buyback growth of 12.51% while FSLR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.