PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
77.59%
Some net income increase while FSLR is negative at -310.22%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-35.92%
Negative yoy D&A while FSLR is 10.39%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
82.19%
Some yoy growth while FSLR is negative at -59.19%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
14.41%
SBC growth well above FSLR's 0.75%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
4740.72%
Slight usage while FSLR is negative at -98.07%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
194.15%
AR growth well above FSLR's 95.77%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
234.29%
Inventory growth well above FSLR's 47.12%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-100.00%
Negative yoy AP while FSLR is 704.30%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
114.13%
Some yoy usage while FSLR is negative at -82.56%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-94.79%
Negative yoy while FSLR is 1090.51%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
521.21%
Some CFO growth while FSLR is negative at -94.70%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-164.44%
Negative yoy CapEx while FSLR is 47.32%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-200.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while FSLR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
99.44%
Some yoy expansion while FSLR is negative at -2125.87%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
3767200.00%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x FSLR's 43.09%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
16357.52%
Growth well above FSLR's 209.08%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
558.45%
Investing outflow well above FSLR's 9.78%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-318.13%
Both yoy lines negative, with FSLR at -37.73%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.47%
We cut yoy buybacks while FSLR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.