PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-198.26%
Negative net income growth while FSLR stands at 75.37%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-0.31%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with FSLR at -5.19%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
95.69%
Some yoy growth while FSLR is negative at -45.62%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-0.12%
Negative yoy SBC while FSLR is 14.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
11187.25%
Well above FSLR's 133.42% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-253.01%
AR is negative yoy while FSLR is 168.79%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
81.98%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. FSLR's 3849.37%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
34640.94%
AP growth well above FSLR's 145.19%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
931.39%
Some yoy usage while FSLR is negative at -406.46%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
947.84%
Well above FSLR's 186.64%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
862.29%
Operating cash flow growth at 50-75% of FSLR's 1367.89%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging operational liquidity vs. competitor.
-360.94%
Negative yoy CapEx while FSLR is 30.09%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. FSLR's 370.88%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-899.45%
Both yoy lines negative, with FSLR at -996.33%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-569.35%
We reduce yoy invests while FSLR stands at 8.42%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-137.35%
Both yoy lines negative, with FSLR at -143.50%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
100.00%
Issuance growth of 100.00% while FSLR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-15.49%
We cut yoy buybacks while FSLR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.