PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
1948.82%
Net income growth above 1.5x FSLR's 480.50%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
0.70%
Some D&A expansion while FSLR is negative at -1.55%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.01%
Less SBC growth vs. FSLR's 92.37%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
58.14%
Slight usage while FSLR is negative at -88.42%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
136.39%
AR growth well above FSLR's 10.13%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-301.92%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with FSLR at -80.65%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
153.71%
A yoy AP increase while FSLR is negative at -222.69%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-195.30%
Both reduce yoy usage, with FSLR at -290.77%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-374.24%
Negative yoy while FSLR is 350.33%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
143.62%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x FSLR's 68.68%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
22.75%
CapEx growth well above FSLR's 18.41%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
100.00%
Acquisition spending well above FSLR's 86.95%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
97.74%
We have some outflow growth while FSLR is negative at -64.86%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
156.27%
Investing outflow well above FSLR's 81.04%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-63.66%
We cut debt repayment yoy while FSLR is 90.66%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
74.27%
Buyback growth of 74.27% while FSLR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.