1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
1011.42%
Net income growth above 1.5x FSLR's 71.63%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
1.21%
Some D&A expansion while FSLR is negative at -1.08%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
1625.45%
Well above FSLR's 165.69% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
2.00%
SBC growth while FSLR is negative at -21.16%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-150.07%
Both reduce yoy usage, with FSLR at -1305.72%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
2643.30%
AR growth while FSLR is negative at -1252.59%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-87.48%
Negative yoy inventory while FSLR is 176.07%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-114.07%
Both negative yoy AP, with FSLR at -213.28%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
24.24%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. FSLR's 79.64%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-72.18%
Both negative yoy, with FSLR at -120.17%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
53.52%
Some CFO growth while FSLR is negative at -265.54%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
45.27%
CapEx growth well above FSLR's 9.61%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
69.34%
Some acquisitions while FSLR is negative at -752.94%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-540.12%
Both yoy lines negative, with FSLR at -102.35%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
47.56%
Investing outflow well above FSLR's 53.00%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-162.72%
Both yoy lines negative, with FSLR at -355.63%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1837.91%
We cut yoy buybacks while FSLR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.