PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
1379.79%
Net income growth at 50-75% of FSLR's 1852.83%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging competitiveness unless expansions are planned.
7.08%
Some D&A expansion while FSLR is negative at -4.42%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
63.39%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. FSLR's 272.46%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
2.82%
Less SBC growth vs. FSLR's 30.21%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
45.46%
Slight usage while FSLR is negative at -442.02%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
32.89%
AR growth while FSLR is negative at -580.35%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
1158.73%
Some inventory rise while FSLR is negative at -400.22%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-20.76%
Negative yoy AP while FSLR is 1141.72%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
155.36%
Some yoy usage while FSLR is negative at -137.13%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-21.86%
Both negative yoy, with FSLR at -798.65%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
75.45%
Some CFO growth while FSLR is negative at -139.88%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-89.74%
Both yoy lines negative, with FSLR at -13.81%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
83.03%
Some acquisitions while FSLR is negative at -774.35%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
96.44%
We have some outflow growth while FSLR is negative at -76.36%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-26.82%
We reduce yoy invests while FSLR stands at 13.30%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-100.08%
Both yoy lines negative, with FSLR at -326.08%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
65.63%
Buyback growth of 65.63% while FSLR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.