PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-121.56%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with FSLR at -132.45%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-15.17%
Negative yoy D&A while FSLR is 0.96%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-121.56%
Negative yoy deferred tax while FSLR stands at 215.89%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-0.78%
Negative yoy SBC while FSLR is 2.88%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-69.90%
Both reduce yoy usage, with FSLR at -167.85%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
126.87%
AR growth while FSLR is negative at -115.76%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-158.13%
Negative yoy inventory while FSLR is 110.28%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-213.14%
Negative yoy AP while FSLR is 126.59%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
100.93%
Some yoy usage while FSLR is negative at -59747.99%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
127.29%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. FSLR's 364.32%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-192.69%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with FSLR at -145.03%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
45.69%
CapEx growth well above FSLR's 24.50%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
100.00%
Acquisition spending well above FSLR's 93.43%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-861.93%
Both yoy lines negative, with FSLR at -170.87%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
68.83%
We have mild expansions while FSLR is negative at -360.73%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-374.75%
Both yoy lines negative, with FSLR at -304.33%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2400.26%
We cut yoy buybacks while FSLR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.