PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-82.89%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with FSLR at -53.12%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
8.76%
Some D&A expansion while FSLR is negative at -1.33%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
57.01%
Some yoy growth while FSLR is negative at -158.99%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
10.59%
SBC growth while FSLR is negative at -3.77%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-205.01%
Negative yoy working capital usage while FSLR is 56.18%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-91.34%
AR is negative yoy while FSLR is 26.60%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
10.31%
Some inventory rise while FSLR is negative at -137.12%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
149.26%
A yoy AP increase while FSLR is negative at -7.08%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-380.39%
Negative yoy usage while FSLR is 347.26%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
38.74%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. FSLR's 97.67%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-185.68%
Negative yoy CFO while FSLR is 152.82%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-41.20%
Negative yoy CapEx while FSLR is 39.84%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
611.40%
Some acquisitions while FSLR is negative at -725.78%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.62%
We have some outflow growth while FSLR is negative at -70.86%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
138.19%
We have mild expansions while FSLR is negative at -209.33%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-3342.90%
We cut debt repayment yoy while FSLR is 67.31%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34.02%
Buyback growth of 34.02% while FSLR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.