PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
36.47%
Net income growth above 1.5x FSLR's 3.92%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
3.64%
Some D&A expansion while FSLR is negative at -8.65%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-102.85%
Negative yoy deferred tax while FSLR stands at 82.55%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
0.27%
SBC growth while FSLR is negative at -2.34%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-48.13%
Negative yoy working capital usage while FSLR is 26.32%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-36.05%
AR is negative yoy while FSLR is 134.48%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
63.94%
Some inventory rise while FSLR is negative at -135.79%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-176.98%
Both negative yoy AP, with FSLR at -270.38%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
10.27%
Some yoy usage while FSLR is negative at -165.79%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
117.59%
Some yoy increase while FSLR is negative at -10906.57%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-24.60%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with FSLR at -4.90%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
42.23%
Some CapEx rise while FSLR is negative at -90.50%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-111.59%
Negative yoy acquisition while FSLR stands at 64.90%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.90%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. FSLR's 81.18%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-297.77%
Both yoy lines negative, with FSLR at -0.83%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
580.36%
We repay more while FSLR is negative at -196.86%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1274.80%
We cut yoy buybacks while FSLR is 4.24%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.