PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
39.35%
Net income growth under 50% of FSLR's 1049.66%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-2.62%
Negative yoy D&A while FSLR is 0.77%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-28.87%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-3.45%
Both cut yoy SBC, with FSLR at -16.88%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
35.68%
Slight usage while FSLR is negative at -41.43%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
63.00%
AR growth well above FSLR's 19.62%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
114.36%
Some inventory rise while FSLR is negative at -73.50%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-383.90%
Both negative yoy AP, with FSLR at -369.52%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
57.31%
Some yoy usage while FSLR is negative at -112.68%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
656.85%
Some yoy increase while FSLR is negative at -93.86%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
57.23%
Some CFO growth while FSLR is negative at -0.69%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-4.10%
Negative yoy CapEx while FSLR is 41.66%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-5521.31%
Both yoy lines negative, with FSLR at -100.00%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-29.25%
We reduce yoy invests while FSLR stands at 176.74%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-101.06%
We cut debt repayment yoy while FSLR is 98.32%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-61.26%
We cut yoy buybacks while FSLR is 0.80%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.