PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
28.04%
Net income growth under 50% of FSLR's 295.95%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
9.75%
D&A growth well above FSLR's 2.29%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-72.59%
Negative yoy deferred tax while FSLR stands at 37.03%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
9.21%
Less SBC growth vs. FSLR's 20.69%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
93.74%
Less working capital growth vs. FSLR's 244.08%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
118.99%
AR growth well above FSLR's 175.88%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
131.68%
Inventory growth well above FSLR's 32.12%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
100.00%
AP growth well above FSLR's 147.88%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
7.94%
Some yoy usage while FSLR is negative at -721.38%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-75.38%
Both negative yoy, with FSLR at -84.87%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
83.55%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of FSLR's 446.46%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-52.37%
Negative yoy CapEx while FSLR is 6.59%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-197.33%
Negative yoy acquisition while FSLR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-88.46%
Both yoy lines negative, with FSLR at -41.34%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-61.84%
Both yoy lines negative, with FSLR at -133.12%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-66.92%
We cut debt repayment yoy while FSLR is 67.29%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.38%
Both yoy lines negative, with FSLR at -983.75%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.