1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
205.27%
Net income growth above 1.5x FSLR's 72.56%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-6.85%
Negative yoy D&A while FSLR is 2.19%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-100.20%
Negative yoy deferred tax while FSLR stands at 179.85%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
10.66%
Less SBC growth vs. FSLR's 114.45%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
12.88%
Less working capital growth vs. FSLR's 121.38%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-598.75%
AR is negative yoy while FSLR is 353.93%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
51.13%
Some inventory rise while FSLR is negative at -90.50%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
180.11%
AP growth well above FSLR's 236.54%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
52.74%
Growth well above FSLR's 93.46%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-513.32%
Both negative yoy, with FSLR at -560.51%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
45.61%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of FSLR's 104.47%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
19.82%
Some CapEx rise while FSLR is negative at -19.78%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-97.64%
We reduce yoy other investing while FSLR is 13604.76%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
74.10%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. FSLR's 187.20%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
61.07%
We repay more while FSLR is negative at -191.53%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
87.27%
Buyback growth at 75-90% of FSLR's 99.57%. Bill Ackman would call for more share repurchases if undervaluation is evident, to match competitor’s approach.