PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-117.45%
Negative net income growth while FSLR stands at 265.10%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-32.11%
Negative yoy D&A while FSLR is 2.42%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-38525.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while FSLR stands at 815.39%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-20.65%
Both cut yoy SBC, with FSLR at -10.56%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
126.73%
Slight usage while FSLR is negative at -823.25%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
104.80%
AR growth while FSLR is negative at -313.29%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-125.59%
Negative yoy inventory while FSLR is 117.64%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
111.69%
A yoy AP increase while FSLR is negative at -129.35%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-69.46%
Negative yoy usage while FSLR is 65.27%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
73.95%
Well above FSLR's 109.70%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
55.50%
Some CFO growth while FSLR is negative at -2440.62%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-52.66%
Both yoy lines negative, with FSLR at -2.28%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-111.53%
Negative yoy acquisition while FSLR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17330.70%
We have some outflow growth while FSLR is negative at -95.55%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
707.59%
We have mild expansions while FSLR is negative at -130.15%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-83.41%
We cut debt repayment yoy while FSLR is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
40.77%
We have some buyback growth while FSLR is negative at -398.53%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.