PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
145.21%
Net income growth under 50% of FSLR's 320.03%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-29.50%
Negative yoy D&A while FSLR is 3.13%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-56.05%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
2.77%
Less SBC growth vs. FSLR's 90.92%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-8.46%
Negative yoy working capital usage while FSLR is 199.14%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-26.49%
AR is negative yoy while FSLR is 133.56%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-114.81%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with FSLR at -98.70%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
251.90%
A yoy AP increase while FSLR is negative at -175.72%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-120.90%
Negative yoy usage while FSLR is 1883.52%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-107.79%
Both negative yoy, with FSLR at -2545.84%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-311.47%
Negative yoy CFO while FSLR is 40.69%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
22.82%
CapEx growth well above FSLR's 1.91%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
216.62%
We have some outflow growth while FSLR is negative at -90.86%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-503.99%
We reduce yoy invests while FSLR stands at 331.12%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
100.00%
We repay more while FSLR is negative at -2356.04%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
94.96%
We have some buyback growth while FSLR is negative at -240.00%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.