PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
814.69%
Some net income increase while FSLR is negative at -25.37%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-78.48%
Negative yoy D&A while FSLR is 0.42%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
2799.84%
Well above FSLR's 2265.33% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-0.22%
Negative yoy SBC while FSLR is 53.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-118.67%
Both reduce yoy usage, with FSLR at -216.16%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-125.99%
AR is negative yoy while FSLR is 103.63%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-228.89%
Negative yoy inventory while FSLR is 94.55%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-253.18%
Negative yoy AP while FSLR is 201.62%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
297.30%
Some yoy usage while FSLR is negative at -2841.79%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-165.75%
Negative yoy while FSLR is 111.95%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
134.63%
Some CFO growth while FSLR is negative at -10.38%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
50.41%
CapEx growth well above FSLR's 15.97%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
112.76%
Acquisition growth of 112.76% while FSLR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
100.00%
Some yoy expansion while FSLR is negative at -154.54%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
1927.93%
We have some liquidation growth while FSLR is negative at -61.88%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-112.13%
We reduce yoy other investing while FSLR is 16727.08%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
309.96%
We have mild expansions while FSLR is negative at -806.58%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5828.38%
We cut yoy buybacks while FSLR is 77.51%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.