PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-112.00%
Negative net income growth while FSLR stands at 81.21%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
10.99%
D&A growth well above FSLR's 5.96%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-122.16%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-9.82%
Both cut yoy SBC, with FSLR at -71.88%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-285.82%
Both reduce yoy usage, with FSLR at -201.82%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
129.25%
AR growth while FSLR is negative at -192.85%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
53.27%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. FSLR's 472.95%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
69.14%
A yoy AP increase while FSLR is negative at -47.74%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-106.69%
Negative yoy usage while FSLR is 82.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
109.60%
Some yoy increase while FSLR is negative at -1202.28%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-367.05%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with FSLR at -250.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-2.44%
Both yoy lines negative, with FSLR at -0.90%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while FSLR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-99.10%
We reduce yoy sales while FSLR is 448.58%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
100.00%
We have some outflow growth while FSLR is negative at -99.47%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-101.00%
We reduce yoy invests while FSLR stands at 209.81%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
110.53%
We repay more while FSLR is negative at -5232.10%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
51.72%
We have some buyback growth while FSLR is negative at -24036.92%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.