PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-119.63%
Negative net income growth while FSLR stands at 229.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
165.44%
D&A growth well above FSLR's 2.06%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
118.57%
Some yoy growth while FSLR is negative at -714.87%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
30.31%
Less SBC growth vs. FSLR's 64.54%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
58.77%
Less working capital growth vs. FSLR's 191.65%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
5.03%
AR growth while FSLR is negative at -98.96%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
151.37%
Inventory growth well above FSLR's 108.83%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-87.76%
Negative yoy AP while FSLR is 146.05%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
39.26%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. FSLR's 239.10%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
6295.31%
Some yoy increase while FSLR is negative at -71902.33%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
48.66%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of FSLR's 163.40%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-39.32%
Both yoy lines negative, with FSLR at -28.38%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines are negative, with FSLR at -66.89%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
100.00%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. FSLR's 400.00%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-9.77%
We reduce yoy invests while FSLR stands at 4897.25%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
100.00%
We repay more while FSLR is negative at -10095.66%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
69.23%
Buyback growth at 50-75% of FSLR's 99.25%. Martin Whitman questions partial disadvantage in per-share enhancements if competitor repurchases more.