PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-94.66%
Negative net income growth while FSLR stands at 84.65%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
18.09%
D&A growth well above FSLR's 4.62%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
3.05%
Some yoy growth while FSLR is negative at -940.06%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-17.23%
Both cut yoy SBC, with FSLR at -36.43%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-115.10%
Negative yoy working capital usage while FSLR is 717.30%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
109.33%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. FSLR's 280.09%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
-1446.12%
Negative yoy inventory while FSLR is 14159.73%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
292.60%
AP growth well above FSLR's 39.20%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-358.11%
Negative yoy usage while FSLR is 790.88%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
107.84%
Some yoy increase while FSLR is negative at -1255.28%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-119.63%
Negative yoy CFO while FSLR is 516.57%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
61.42%
Some CapEx rise while FSLR is negative at -46.42%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-89.58%
Both yoy lines negative, with FSLR at -21.03%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2709.17%
We reduce yoy other investing while FSLR is 81.43%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-106.13%
We reduce yoy invests while FSLR stands at 25.07%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
107.83%
We repay more while FSLR is negative at -446347.06%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.89%
We cut yoy buybacks while FSLR is 90.37%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.