PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
39.41%
Net income growth under 50% of FSLR's 300.79%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
52.52%
D&A growth well above FSLR's 4.14%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
134.72%
Well above FSLR's 122.93% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
25.91%
SBC growth well above FSLR's 27.44%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
92.45%
Slight usage while FSLR is negative at -256.71%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-4.51%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with FSLR at -723.36%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
35.12%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. FSLR's 92.98%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
105.06%
A yoy AP increase while FSLR is negative at -115.89%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
947.03%
Some yoy usage while FSLR is negative at -84.67%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-106.77%
Both negative yoy, with FSLR at -1115.86%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
85.81%
Some CFO growth while FSLR is negative at -159.20%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-20.07%
Both yoy lines negative, with FSLR at -3.16%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-88.72%
We reduce yoy sales while FSLR is 12.15%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-1996.72%
We reduce yoy other investing while FSLR is 216.62%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-156.15%
We reduce yoy invests while FSLR stands at 84.75%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
130.19%
Debt repayment above 1.5x FSLR's 18.51%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
75.88%
Buyback growth at 75-90% of FSLR's 93.17%. Bill Ackman would call for more share repurchases if undervaluation is evident, to match competitor’s approach.