1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
92.26%
Some net income increase while FSLR is negative at -32.25%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-97.69%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with FSLR at -3.33%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-100.00%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-73.52%
Both cut yoy SBC, with FSLR at -38.32%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-98.91%
Both reduce yoy usage, with FSLR at -132.32%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-73.45%
AR is negative yoy while FSLR is 270.24%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-88.44%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with FSLR at -450.68%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-24.95%
Negative yoy AP while FSLR is 54.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-105.01%
Both reduce yoy usage, with FSLR at -107.23%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
54.51%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. FSLR's 1057.87%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
82.45%
Some CFO growth while FSLR is negative at -52.29%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
95.10%
Some CapEx rise while FSLR is negative at -19.18%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Some yoy expansion while FSLR is negative at -45.14%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines are negative, with FSLR at -26.52%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-285.61%
We reduce yoy other investing while FSLR is 70.19%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
96.23%
We have mild expansions while FSLR is negative at -228.38%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-108.96%
We cut debt repayment yoy while FSLR is 1.84%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
We have some buyback growth while FSLR is negative at -63073.33%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.