PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
161.63%
Net income growth above 1.5x MAXN's 75.93%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-11.90%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with MAXN at -60.73%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-100.00%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-71.67%
Negative yoy SBC while MAXN is 81.64%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-365.95%
Negative yoy working capital usage while MAXN is 186.90%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
59.85%
AR growth while MAXN is negative at -42.57%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-4.46%
Negative yoy inventory while MAXN is 171.57%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-40.54%
Negative yoy AP while MAXN is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-589.33%
Negative yoy usage while MAXN is 163.52%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
111.65%
Some yoy increase while MAXN is negative at -91.52%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-431.41%
Negative yoy CFO while MAXN is 93.92%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-63.82%
Negative yoy CapEx while MAXN is 63.19%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
62.75%
Purchases growth of 62.75% while MAXN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
11.99%
Liquidation growth of 11.99% while MAXN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-43.93%
We reduce yoy other investing while MAXN is 388.13%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
36.96%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. MAXN's 79.56%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
We slightly raise equity while MAXN is negative at -100.85%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.