1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-92.54%
Negative net income growth while MAXN stands at 75.93%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
11.35%
Some D&A expansion while MAXN is negative at -60.73%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
17.83%
Some yoy growth while MAXN is negative at -201.96%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-2.17%
Negative yoy SBC while MAXN is 81.64%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
58.39%
Less working capital growth vs. MAXN's 186.90%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
61.56%
AR growth while MAXN is negative at -42.57%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
13.28%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. MAXN's 171.57%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-467.28%
Negative yoy usage while MAXN is 163.52%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
72.44%
Some yoy increase while MAXN is negative at -91.52%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
17.58%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of MAXN's 93.92%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
61.76%
CapEx growth well above MAXN's 63.19%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-60.20%
Negative yoy purchasing while MAXN stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-2.67%
We reduce yoy sales while MAXN is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
111.02%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. MAXN's 388.13%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
99.76%
Investing outflow well above MAXN's 79.56%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
822.27%
Debt repayment above 1.5x MAXN's 4.94%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
100.00%
We slightly raise equity while MAXN is negative at -100.85%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
-5.63%
We cut yoy buybacks while MAXN is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.