PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
708.13%
Net income growth above 1.5x MAXN's 75.93%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-2.72%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with MAXN at -60.73%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-143.44%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
4.10%
Less SBC growth vs. MAXN's 81.64%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
150.95%
Well above MAXN's 186.90% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-181.74%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with MAXN at -42.57%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-153.50%
Negative yoy inventory while MAXN is 171.57%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
80.99%
AP growth of 80.99% while MAXN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
137.65%
Growth well above MAXN's 163.52%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
112.79%
Some yoy increase while MAXN is negative at -91.52%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
946.34%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x MAXN's 93.92%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-235.47%
Negative yoy CapEx while MAXN is 63.19%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2383.17%
Negative yoy purchasing while MAXN stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-149.58%
We reduce yoy other investing while MAXN is 388.13%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-229.08%
We reduce yoy invests while MAXN stands at 79.56%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
400.53%
Debt repayment above 1.5x MAXN's 4.94%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-104.63%
We cut yoy buybacks while MAXN is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.