PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
77.59%
Net income growth similar to MAXN's 75.93%. Walter Schloss would find parallel expansions or market conditions in both firms’ profitability.
-35.92%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with MAXN at -60.73%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
82.19%
Some yoy growth while MAXN is negative at -201.96%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
14.41%
Less SBC growth vs. MAXN's 81.64%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
4740.72%
Well above MAXN's 186.90% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
194.15%
AR growth while MAXN is negative at -42.57%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
234.29%
Inventory growth well above MAXN's 171.57%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-100.00%
Negative yoy AP while MAXN is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
114.13%
Growth well above MAXN's 163.52%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-94.79%
Both negative yoy, with MAXN at -91.52%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
521.21%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x MAXN's 93.92%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-164.44%
Negative yoy CapEx while MAXN is 63.19%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-200.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while MAXN stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
99.44%
Purchases growth of 99.44% while MAXN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
3767200.00%
Liquidation growth of 3767200.00% while MAXN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
16357.52%
Growth well above MAXN's 388.13%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
558.45%
Investing outflow well above MAXN's 79.56%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-318.13%
We cut debt repayment yoy while MAXN is 4.94%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.47%
We cut yoy buybacks while MAXN is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.