PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-198.26%
Negative net income growth while MAXN stands at 75.93%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-0.31%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with MAXN at -60.73%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
95.69%
Some yoy growth while MAXN is negative at -201.96%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-0.12%
Negative yoy SBC while MAXN is 81.64%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
11187.25%
Well above MAXN's 186.90% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-253.01%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with MAXN at -42.57%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
81.98%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. MAXN's 171.57%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
34640.94%
AP growth of 34640.94% while MAXN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
931.39%
Growth well above MAXN's 163.52%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
947.84%
Some yoy increase while MAXN is negative at -91.52%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
862.29%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x MAXN's 93.92%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-360.94%
Negative yoy CapEx while MAXN is 63.19%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Purchases growth of 100.00% while MAXN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-899.45%
We reduce yoy other investing while MAXN is 388.13%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-569.35%
We reduce yoy invests while MAXN stands at 79.56%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-137.35%
We cut debt repayment yoy while MAXN is 4.94%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
100.00%
We slightly raise equity while MAXN is negative at -100.85%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
-15.49%
We cut yoy buybacks while MAXN is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.