PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-95.57%
Negative net income growth while MAXN stands at 75.93%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
1.22%
Some D&A expansion while MAXN is negative at -60.73%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
75.59%
Some yoy growth while MAXN is negative at -201.96%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
20.63%
Less SBC growth vs. MAXN's 81.64%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
56.94%
Less working capital growth vs. MAXN's 186.90%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-94.41%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with MAXN at -42.57%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
149.50%
Inventory growth well above MAXN's 171.57%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
195.83%
AP growth of 195.83% while MAXN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-104.82%
Negative yoy usage while MAXN is 163.52%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
130.36%
Some yoy increase while MAXN is negative at -91.52%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
13.88%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of MAXN's 93.92%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-80.19%
Negative yoy CapEx while MAXN is 63.19%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while MAXN is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
123.11%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. MAXN's 388.13%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-179.52%
We reduce yoy invests while MAXN stands at 79.56%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
346.36%
Debt repayment above 1.5x MAXN's 4.94%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-60.24%
We cut yoy buybacks while MAXN is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.