1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
36.47%
Net income growth under 50% of MAXN's 75.93%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
3.64%
Some D&A expansion while MAXN is negative at -60.73%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-102.85%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
0.27%
Less SBC growth vs. MAXN's 81.64%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-48.13%
Negative yoy working capital usage while MAXN is 186.90%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-36.05%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with MAXN at -42.57%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
63.94%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. MAXN's 171.57%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
-176.98%
Negative yoy AP while MAXN is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
10.27%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. MAXN's 163.52%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
117.59%
Some yoy increase while MAXN is negative at -91.52%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-24.60%
Negative yoy CFO while MAXN is 93.92%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
42.23%
CapEx growth well above MAXN's 63.19%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-111.59%
Negative yoy acquisition while MAXN stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.90%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. MAXN's 388.13%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-297.77%
We reduce yoy invests while MAXN stands at 79.56%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
580.36%
Debt repayment above 1.5x MAXN's 4.94%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1274.80%
We cut yoy buybacks while MAXN is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.