PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-227.81%
Negative net income growth while MAXN stands at 75.93%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-3.18%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with MAXN at -60.73%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
615.99%
Some yoy growth while MAXN is negative at -201.96%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-5.80%
Negative yoy SBC while MAXN is 81.64%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
43.71%
Less working capital growth vs. MAXN's 186.90%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-228.96%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with MAXN at -42.57%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-21.81%
Negative yoy inventory while MAXN is 171.57%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
132.85%
AP growth of 132.85% while MAXN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-26.80%
Negative yoy usage while MAXN is 163.52%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
793.74%
Some yoy increase while MAXN is negative at -91.52%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
47.66%
Operating cash flow growth at 50-75% of MAXN's 93.92%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging operational liquidity vs. competitor.
8.55%
Lower CapEx growth vs. MAXN's 63.19%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
1728.56%
Acquisition growth of 1728.56% while MAXN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
280.77%
Growth well above MAXN's 388.13%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
3204.14%
Investing outflow well above MAXN's 79.56%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-836.47%
We cut debt repayment yoy while MAXN is 4.94%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
91.74%
Buyback growth of 91.74% while MAXN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.