PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
39.26%
Net income growth of 39.26% while MAXN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a modest advantage that can compound if well-managed.
0.54%
D&A growth of 0.54% while MAXN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost difference that must be justified by expansions.
120.75%
Deferred tax of 120.75% while MAXN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-23.70%
Negative yoy SBC while MAXN is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-205.26%
Negative yoy working capital usage while MAXN is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-35.53%
AR is negative yoy while MAXN is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-164.56%
Negative yoy inventory while MAXN is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
128.76%
Growth of 128.76% while MAXN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
-136.74%
Negative yoy while MAXN is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-466.37%
Negative yoy CFO while MAXN is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
40.73%
CapEx growth of 40.73% while MAXN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost burden that must yield returns in future revenue or margins.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while MAXN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while MAXN is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
151.94%
Growth of 151.94% while MAXN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
57.30%
We expand invests by 57.30% while MAXN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate outflow that must be justified by returns vs. competitor’s stable approach.
-40.11%
We cut debt repayment yoy while MAXN is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1277.94%
We cut yoy buybacks while MAXN is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.