PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
205.27%
Net income growth above 1.5x MAXN's 39.80%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-6.85%
Negative yoy D&A while MAXN is 4.81%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-100.20%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
10.66%
Less SBC growth vs. MAXN's 54.45%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
12.88%
Slight usage while MAXN is negative at -109.49%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-598.75%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with MAXN at -2188.02%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
51.13%
Inventory growth well above MAXN's 57.32%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
180.11%
AP growth well above MAXN's 11.73%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
52.74%
Some yoy usage while MAXN is negative at -2.79%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-513.32%
Negative yoy while MAXN is 42.61%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
45.61%
Some CFO growth while MAXN is negative at -27.03%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
19.82%
Some CapEx rise while MAXN is negative at -86.23%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-97.64%
We reduce yoy other investing while MAXN is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
74.10%
We have mild expansions while MAXN is negative at -78.76%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
61.07%
We repay more while MAXN is negative at -14.83%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
87.27%
Buyback growth of 87.27% while MAXN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.