PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
128.32%
Net income growth above 1.5x MAXN's 11.77%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
18.05%
D&A growth well above MAXN's 14.29%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
395.60%
Some yoy growth while MAXN is negative at -115.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
63.76%
SBC growth while MAXN is negative at -6.35%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-207.91%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MAXN at -28.16%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-801.27%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with MAXN at -9832.87%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
55.84%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. MAXN's 736.20%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
62.45%
A yoy AP increase while MAXN is negative at -221.34%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-1072.33%
Negative yoy usage while MAXN is 394.49%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
42.80%
Well above MAXN's 55.14%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
93.62%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x MAXN's 5.30%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
67.09%
CapEx growth well above MAXN's 29.52%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
328.08%
Acquisition growth of 328.08% while MAXN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while MAXN is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-48.14%
Both yoy lines negative, with MAXN at -1850.00%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-64.49%
We reduce yoy invests while MAXN stands at 28.31%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
975.10%
Debt repayment above 1.5x MAXN's 12.97%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-210.96%
We cut yoy buybacks while MAXN is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.