PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
960.52%
Some net income increase while MAXN is negative at -48.67%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
0.15%
Some D&A expansion while MAXN is negative at -6.43%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
495.70%
Some yoy growth while MAXN is negative at -95.05%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-14.39%
Negative yoy SBC while MAXN is 1.85%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
135.30%
Well above MAXN's 148.18% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
511.77%
AR growth well above MAXN's 86.47%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
184.38%
Inventory growth well above MAXN's 260.48%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
63.67%
AP growth well above MAXN's 89.98%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-890.78%
Negative yoy usage while MAXN is 59.85%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-49.71%
Negative yoy while MAXN is 53.23%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
111.51%
Operating cash flow growth similar to MAXN's 118.76%. Walter Schloss would see parallel improvements or market conditions in cash generation.
2.84%
Lower CapEx growth vs. MAXN's 34.68%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while MAXN is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-58.01%
Both yoy lines negative, with MAXN at -14.28%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
88.34%
Debt repayment above 1.5x MAXN's 28.92%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
78.78%
Buyback growth of 78.78% while MAXN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.