PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
144.23%
Some net income increase while RUN is negative at -0.65%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
3.55%
Less D&A growth vs. RUN's 11.67%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.25%
SBC growth well above RUN's 0.08%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
65.78%
Less working capital growth vs. RUN's 200.00%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
100.00%
AR growth while RUN is negative at -192.98%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
69.80%
Some inventory rise while RUN is negative at -523.06%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-100.00%
Negative yoy AP while RUN is 432.83%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
66.63%
Some yoy usage while RUN is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-300.00%
Both negative yoy, with RUN at -241.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
143.24%
Some CFO growth while RUN is negative at -180.85%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
12.80%
Lower CapEx growth vs. RUN's 210.49%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while RUN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
69.96%
Purchases growth of 69.96% while RUN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-55.04%
We reduce yoy sales while RUN is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
171.29%
Growth of 171.29% while RUN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
117.47%
We have mild expansions while RUN is negative at -5.77%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
74.21%
Buyback growth of 74.21% while RUN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.