PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
345.34%
Some net income increase while RUN is negative at -0.65%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
10.04%
D&A growth well above RUN's 11.67%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
44.97%
Well above RUN's 13.07% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
28.64%
SBC growth well above RUN's 0.08%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
56.22%
Less working capital growth vs. RUN's 200.00%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-259.83%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with RUN at -192.98%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
191.59%
Some inventory rise while RUN is negative at -523.06%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
100.00%
Lower AP growth vs. RUN's 432.83%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
-2268.79%
Both reduce yoy usage, with RUN at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-273.90%
Both negative yoy, with RUN at -241.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
105.32%
Some CFO growth while RUN is negative at -180.85%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
0.84%
Lower CapEx growth vs. RUN's 210.49%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-91.74%
We reduce yoy sales while RUN is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-260.93%
We reduce yoy other investing while RUN is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-93.26%
Both yoy lines negative, with RUN at -5.77%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
266.93%
Debt repayment above 1.5x RUN's 2.78%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
67.66%
Buyback growth of 67.66% while RUN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.