PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-46.92%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with RUN at -0.65%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
3.62%
Less D&A growth vs. RUN's 11.67%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
389.61%
Well above RUN's 13.07% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
12.25%
SBC growth well above RUN's 0.08%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
174.27%
Well above RUN's 200.00% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
71.27%
AR growth while RUN is negative at -192.98%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-67.00%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with RUN at -523.06%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
127.39%
Some yoy usage while RUN is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
55.61%
Some yoy increase while RUN is negative at -241.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
2691.15%
Some CFO growth while RUN is negative at -180.85%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
10.33%
Lower CapEx growth vs. RUN's 210.49%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
557.36%
Liquidation growth of 557.36% while RUN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-177.12%
We reduce yoy other investing while RUN is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-55.83%
Both yoy lines negative, with RUN at -5.77%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-104.09%
We cut debt repayment yoy while RUN is 2.78%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.20%
Buyback growth of 23.20% while RUN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.