PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
231.42%
Some net income increase while RUN is negative at -0.65%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
4.76%
Less D&A growth vs. RUN's 11.67%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-86.46%
Negative yoy deferred tax while RUN stands at 13.07%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
35.15%
SBC growth well above RUN's 0.08%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
16.52%
Less working capital growth vs. RUN's 200.00%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-508.40%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with RUN at -192.98%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
43.48%
Some inventory rise while RUN is negative at -523.06%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
319.07%
AP growth well above RUN's 432.83%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-140.57%
Both reduce yoy usage, with RUN at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
48.38%
Some yoy increase while RUN is negative at -241.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
57.45%
Some CFO growth while RUN is negative at -180.85%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
92.35%
Lower CapEx growth vs. RUN's 210.49%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1927.59%
Growth of 1927.59% while RUN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
271.13%
We have mild expansions while RUN is negative at -5.77%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-356.84%
We cut debt repayment yoy while RUN is 2.78%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
29.49%
Buyback growth of 29.49% while RUN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.