PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
708.13%
Some net income increase while RUN is negative at -0.65%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-2.72%
Negative yoy D&A while RUN is 11.67%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-143.44%
Negative yoy deferred tax while RUN stands at 13.07%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
4.10%
SBC growth well above RUN's 0.08%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
150.95%
Well above RUN's 200.00% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-181.74%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with RUN at -192.98%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-153.50%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with RUN at -523.06%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
80.99%
Lower AP growth vs. RUN's 432.83%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
137.65%
Some yoy usage while RUN is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
112.79%
Some yoy increase while RUN is negative at -241.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
946.34%
Some CFO growth while RUN is negative at -180.85%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-235.47%
Negative yoy CapEx while RUN is 210.49%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2383.17%
Negative yoy purchasing while RUN stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-149.58%
We reduce yoy other investing while RUN is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-229.08%
Both yoy lines negative, with RUN at -5.77%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
400.53%
Debt repayment above 1.5x RUN's 2.78%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-104.63%
We cut yoy buybacks while RUN is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.