PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-150.75%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with RUN at -0.65%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
6.21%
D&A growth well above RUN's 11.67%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
1306.90%
Well above RUN's 13.07% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-7.55%
Negative yoy SBC while RUN is 0.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
92.99%
Less working capital growth vs. RUN's 200.00%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-5.15%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with RUN at -192.98%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-129.49%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with RUN at -523.06%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
204.80%
Lower AP growth vs. RUN's 432.83%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
213.44%
Some yoy usage while RUN is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
699.03%
Some yoy increase while RUN is negative at -241.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
120.36%
Some CFO growth while RUN is negative at -180.85%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
25.82%
Lower CapEx growth vs. RUN's 210.49%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
8190.69%
Acquisition growth of 8190.69% while RUN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-29.87%
Negative yoy purchasing while RUN stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while RUN is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-102.55%
We reduce yoy other investing while RUN is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-228.81%
Both yoy lines negative, with RUN at -5.77%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
312.87%
Debt repayment above 1.5x RUN's 2.78%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.51%
Buyback growth of 12.51% while RUN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.