PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-12.95%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with RUN at -0.65%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
0.42%
Less D&A growth vs. RUN's 11.67%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
315.48%
Well above RUN's 13.07% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-9.36%
Negative yoy SBC while RUN is 0.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
75.62%
Less working capital growth vs. RUN's 200.00%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-20.95%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with RUN at -192.98%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
575.36%
Some inventory rise while RUN is negative at -523.06%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-2123.16%
Negative yoy AP while RUN is 432.83%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
116.62%
Some yoy usage while RUN is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
282.25%
Some yoy increase while RUN is negative at -241.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
67.36%
Some CFO growth while RUN is negative at -180.85%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
8.91%
Lower CapEx growth vs. RUN's 210.49%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while RUN is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-82.69%
We reduce yoy other investing while RUN is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-211.05%
Both yoy lines negative, with RUN at -5.77%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
99.82%
Debt repayment above 1.5x RUN's 2.78%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while RUN is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
66.05%
Buyback growth of 66.05% while RUN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.