PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
42.34%
Some net income increase while RUN is negative at -0.65%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-15.57%
Negative yoy D&A while RUN is 11.67%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-151.38%
Negative yoy deferred tax while RUN stands at 13.07%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-18.44%
Negative yoy SBC while RUN is 0.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
92.37%
Less working capital growth vs. RUN's 200.00%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-146.33%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with RUN at -192.98%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-29.47%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with RUN at -523.06%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
100.22%
Lower AP growth vs. RUN's 432.83%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
-137.55%
Both reduce yoy usage, with RUN at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-183.71%
Both negative yoy, with RUN at -241.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
28.86%
Some CFO growth while RUN is negative at -180.85%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
45.12%
Lower CapEx growth vs. RUN's 210.49%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
85.64%
Purchases growth of 85.64% while RUN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-64.58%
We reduce yoy other investing while RUN is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
53.06%
We have mild expansions while RUN is negative at -5.77%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
1414.26%
Debt repayment above 1.5x RUN's 2.78%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
82.87%
Buyback growth of 82.87% while RUN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.