PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
57.20%
Some net income increase while RUN is negative at -0.65%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-11.73%
Negative yoy D&A while RUN is 11.67%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
4394.55%
Well above RUN's 13.07% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-8.03%
Negative yoy SBC while RUN is 0.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-20.41%
Negative yoy working capital usage while RUN is 200.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
153.24%
AR growth while RUN is negative at -192.98%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-107.15%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with RUN at -523.06%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-119.52%
Negative yoy AP while RUN is 432.83%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
36.75%
Some yoy usage while RUN is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-89.45%
Both negative yoy, with RUN at -241.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-31.01%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with RUN at -180.85%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
28.88%
Lower CapEx growth vs. RUN's 210.49%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while RUN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
181.89%
Growth of 181.89% while RUN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
64.47%
We have mild expansions while RUN is negative at -5.77%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-3049.75%
We cut debt repayment yoy while RUN is 2.78%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4014.56%
We cut yoy buybacks while RUN is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.