PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
1011.42%
Net income growth of 1011.42% while RUN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a modest advantage that can compound if well-managed.
1.21%
D&A growth of 1.21% while RUN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost difference that must be justified by expansions.
1625.45%
Deferred tax of 1625.45% while RUN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
2.00%
SBC growth of 2.00% while RUN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
-150.07%
Negative yoy working capital usage while RUN is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
2643.30%
AR growth of 2643.30% while RUN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
-87.48%
Negative yoy inventory while RUN is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-114.07%
Negative yoy AP while RUN is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
24.24%
Growth of 24.24% while RUN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
-72.18%
Negative yoy while RUN is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
53.52%
CFO growth of 53.52% while RUN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a modest edge that could widen if cost discipline remains strong.
45.27%
CapEx growth of 45.27% while RUN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost burden that must yield returns in future revenue or margins.
69.34%
Acquisition growth of 69.34% while RUN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-540.12%
We reduce yoy other investing while RUN is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
47.56%
We expand invests by 47.56% while RUN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate outflow that must be justified by returns vs. competitor’s stable approach.
-162.72%
We cut debt repayment yoy while RUN is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1837.91%
We cut yoy buybacks while RUN is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.