PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-97.29%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with RUN at -33.16%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-5.30%
Negative yoy D&A while RUN is 13.53%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-180.91%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-10.22%
Negative yoy SBC while RUN is 33.35%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-197.94%
Negative yoy working capital usage while RUN is 65.49%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-189.22%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with RUN at -253.94%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-151.13%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with RUN at -31.38%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-512.23%
Negative yoy AP while RUN is 861.07%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
120.79%
Growth well above RUN's 44.30%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
58.83%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. RUN's 300.00%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-361.62%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with RUN at -110.70%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
9.77%
Some CapEx rise while RUN is negative at -92.27%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-17.57%
Negative yoy acquisition while RUN stands at 98.14%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-148.76%
We reduce yoy other investing while RUN is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-6.33%
Both yoy lines negative, with RUN at -22.98%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
3019.57%
We repay more while RUN is negative at -34.76%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
78.63%
Buyback growth of 78.63% while RUN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.