1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
1379.79%
Some net income increase while RUN is negative at -37.77%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
7.08%
D&A growth well above RUN's 8.29%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
63.39%
Well above RUN's 101.60% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
2.82%
SBC growth while RUN is negative at -29.88%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
45.46%
Slight usage while RUN is negative at -23.57%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
32.89%
AR growth while RUN is negative at -149.43%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
1158.73%
Some inventory rise while RUN is negative at -750.33%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-20.76%
Both negative yoy AP, with RUN at -58.70%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
155.36%
Growth well above RUN's 39.49%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-21.86%
Both negative yoy, with RUN at -44.71%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
75.45%
Some CFO growth while RUN is negative at -405.89%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-89.74%
Both yoy lines negative, with RUN at -0.43%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
83.03%
Acquisition spending well above RUN's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
96.44%
Growth well above RUN's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-26.82%
We reduce yoy invests while RUN stands at 0.13%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-100.08%
Both yoy lines negative, with RUN at -38.80%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
65.63%
Buyback growth of 65.63% while RUN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.