PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
679.42%
Some net income increase while RUN is negative at -21.98%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
30.88%
D&A growth well above RUN's 8.86%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
542.07%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. RUN's 6495.69%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
-0.53%
Negative yoy SBC while RUN is 84.19%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
16.99%
Slight usage while RUN is negative at -73.90%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
125.75%
AR growth while RUN is negative at -60.88%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
749.51%
Inventory growth well above RUN's 114.39%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
136.48%
A yoy AP increase while RUN is negative at -63.67%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-545.94%
Both reduce yoy usage, with RUN at -63.39%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-341.00%
Negative yoy while RUN is 2195.74%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
477.41%
Some CFO growth while RUN is negative at -95.06%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-98.76%
Both yoy lines negative, with RUN at -3.36%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-11918.40%
Negative yoy acquisition while RUN stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-891.13%
We reduce yoy other investing while RUN is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-384.47%
Both yoy lines negative, with RUN at -3.36%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
32350.88%
We repay more while RUN is negative at -5715.10%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
51.56%
Buyback growth of 51.56% while RUN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.