PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-121.56%
Negative net income growth while RUN stands at 4.56%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-15.17%
Negative yoy D&A while RUN is 9.44%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-121.56%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-0.78%
Negative yoy SBC while RUN is 1.23%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-69.90%
Negative yoy working capital usage while RUN is 315.90%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
126.87%
AR growth well above RUN's 34.86%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-158.13%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with RUN at -1112.02%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-213.14%
Negative yoy AP while RUN is 2161.29%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
100.93%
Growth well above RUN's 29.92%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
127.29%
Some yoy increase while RUN is negative at -61.10%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-192.69%
Negative yoy CFO while RUN is 80.52%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
45.69%
Some CapEx rise while RUN is negative at -6.94%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while RUN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-861.93%
We reduce yoy other investing while RUN is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
68.83%
We have mild expansions while RUN is negative at -6.94%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-374.75%
We cut debt repayment yoy while RUN is 98.89%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2400.26%
We cut yoy buybacks while RUN is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.